The news surrounding Microsoft Copilot+ highlights several key aspects of the platform, particularly in terms of its hardware and software capabilities, as well as some challenges it faces in the market.
Battery Life is a notable strength of the Copilot+ PCs, especially those powered by the Snapdragon X Elite chip, which reportedly offers performance comparable to MacBooks. This suggests that users can expect extended usage times, which is a critical factor for many consumers when choosing a laptop.
System Performance is another area where Copilot+ shows promise. The integration of both Intel and AMD processors expands the platform's capabilities, allowing it to compete effectively against established products like MacBooks. Additionally, Microsoft's Prism emulation technology enhances app performance on Arm devices, which is crucial for users who rely on various applications.
In terms of Hardware, the introduction of Copilot+ PCs with advanced processors indicates a significant step forward. Devices like the ASUS Zenbook S 14 with Intel Core Ultra Series 2 have received positive first impressions, suggesting that the hardware is well-received in the market. However, the limited market share of only 0.8% for PCs sold in Q3 2024 raises concerns about the overall adoption of these devices.
Software compatibility remains a significant challenge for Copilot+. While over 93% of app usage is in applications compatible with Arm devices, many popular applications have not been recompiled for native Arm compatibility. This creates a barrier for users who depend on non-native apps, which could hinder the overall user experience.
Security and Privacy aspects were not explicitly mentioned in the news summaries, but given the increasing focus on AI and data handling, these will likely be critical considerations as the platform evolves.
Reliability is another concern, particularly as some features for Intel and AMD-powered Copilot+ PCs are still in testing. This indicates that while the platform is promising, it may not yet be fully stable for all users.
Compatibility issues are prevalent, especially with unoptimized apps and the lack of native support for gaming platforms like Steam. This could limit the appeal of Copilot+ PCs to a broader audience, particularly gamers and users reliant on specific software.
Overall, while Microsoft Copilot+ presents a compelling offering with strong performance and battery life, it faces significant hurdles in terms of software compatibility and market adoption. The future rollout of more compatible devices and applications will be crucial for its success.
| Key positive aspects of Copilot+ | Key concerns related to Copilot+ |
|---|---|
| Copilot+ PCs now include Intel and AMD processors, expanding compatibility. | Many users are unaware of what a Copilot+ PC is, leading to confusion. |
| Performance details show Copilot+ PCs can compete with MacBooks. | App compatibility remains a significant issue, especially for non-native apps. |
| Microsoft's Prism emulation technology improves app performance on Arm devices. | Only 0.8% market share of PCs sold in Q3 2024 indicates low adoption. |
| Over 93% of app usage is in apps compatible with Arm devices, suggesting usability for many users. | Some features for Intel and AMD-powered Copilot+ PCs are still in testing. |
| Positive first impressions of devices like the ASUS Zenbook S 14 with Intel Core Ultra Series 2. | The majority of PC apps have not been recompiled for native Arm compatibility. |
| Future rollout of more Intel and AMD-powered Copilot+ PCs expected to boost platform growth. | Some apps do not work on Windows on Arm at all, limiting options for users. |
This is not a Copilot+ review.
Source: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/do-more-with-surface/how-to-screen-cast-to-tv
This is not a Copilot+ review.
| Key positive aspects of Copilot+ | Key concerns related to Copilot+ |
|---|---|
| Strong performance attributed to Snapdragon X Elite chip | Multiple compatibility issues with unoptimized apps |
| MacBook-rivaling battery life | Difficulty using non-optimized Windows on Arm apps |
| Compatible with popular apps like Chrome, Firefox, Zoom, Spotify, and Adobe Photoshop | Lack of native support for gaming platforms like Steam |
| Impressive gaming visuals in demos | Xbox app and other games not running natively on Arm processors |
| Potential for significant improvements in 2025 | Need for more compatible Windows on Arm apps |
| Early stages of next-gen chip development with Snapdragon X Elite 2 | Limited gaming performance on current Copilot+ PCs |
Source: https://www.inkl.com/news/one-windows-evolution-excites-me-about-laptops-in-2025
This is not a Copilot+ review.
This is not a Copilot+ review.
Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/2548469/amds-wins-fails-and-wtf-moments-of-2024.html
This is not a Copilot+ review.
Source: https://biz.chosun.com/en/en-it/2025/01/01/MADAT22VNJD5JO64BVIQARXMJE/
This is not a Copilot+ review.
Source: https://gb.readly.com/magazines/maximum-pc/2024-12-31/676ca237238753a86ddf9816
| Key positive aspects of Copilot+ | Key concerns related to Copilot+ |
|---|---|
| Integration of AI capabilities into familiar PC applications like Photos and Paint | Limited availability of fully functional Copilot+ PCs due to necessary updates from Microsoft |
| Enhanced voice interaction capabilities allowing for natural language conversations with AI | Recall feature delayed for further testing, affecting user experience |
| Improved hardware features, such as advanced microphones for better voice interaction | Only one chip architecture (Snapdragon X) currently qualifies as a Copilot+ PC processor |
| AI noise filtering technology enhancing communication during calls | Lack of a unified message from PC vendors about the benefits of AI PCs |
| Ecosystem connectivity with devices like Samsung's Galaxy products | Slow progress in establishing a comprehensive ecosystem of Copilot+ PCs |
This is not a Copilot+ review.